DOVNER
v.
CIRCLE 4 ENTERTAINMENT FUND LLC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS’ AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses [ECF No. 54] (“Motion”).
Having reviewed the record, Defendants’ Response [ECF No. 57], and being otherwise fully advised, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s Motion [ECF No. 54] is DENIED. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) provides that “[up]on motion made by a party . . . the court may strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.” However, “a court will not exercise its discretion under the rule to strike a pleading unless the matter sought to be omitted has no possible relationship to the controversy, may confuse the issues, or otherwise prejudice a party.” Bank of Am., N.A. v. GREC Homes IX, LLC, No. 13-CV-21718, 2014 WL 351962, at *4 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 23, 2014) (quoting Reyher v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 881 F. Supp. 574, 576 (M.D. Fla. 1995)).
Thus, “[m]otions to strike generally are disfavored and ‘will usually be denied unless the allegations have no possible relation to the controversy and may cause prejudice to one of the parties.’” Merrill Lynch Bus. Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Performance Machine Sys. U.S.A., Inc., No. 04-CV-60861, 2005 WL 975773, at *11 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 4, 2005). Plaintiff's Motion argues that most of Defendants’ 29 affirmative defenses are either simple denials lacking any factual support and/or they fail as a matter of law. See generally Mot.
However, the Court is not persuaded that Defendants’ defenses are invalid, and even those defenses which arguably lack factual particularity are nonetheless sufficient. Plaintiff is on fair notice of Defendants’ defenses and entitled to seek factual clarity regarding the same through discovery. See, e.g., Jones v. Kohl’s Dep’t Stores, Inc., No. 15-CV-61626, 2015 WL 12781195, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 16, 2015) (“To the extent Plaintiff requires greater factual detail for these defenses, Plaintiff[s] may acquire those facts through discovery.”); Alhassid v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 14-CV-20484, 2015 WL 11216747, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 27, 2015) (denying motion to strike “boilerplate but well-recognized” defenses that “lack factual particularity”); Guarantee Ins. Co. v. Brand Mgmt. Serv., Inc., No. 12-CV-61677, 2013 WL 4496510, at *4-5 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2013) (denying motion to strike as to defense of unclean hands, waiver, laches, and estoppel).
Because the defenses sufficiently satisfy applicable pleading standards and Plaintiff is able to engage in discovery and prepare for trial, the Court finds Plaintiff's Motion warrants denial. DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 24th day of September, 2020.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dovner v. Circle 4 Ent. Fund LLC, 2014 WL 351962 (S.D. Fla. 2020)…iscretion under the rule to strike a pleading unless the matter sought to be omitted has no possible relationship to the controversy, may confuse the issues, or otherwise prejudice a party.” Bank of Am., N.A. v. GREC Homes IX, LLC, No. 13-CV-21718, 2014 WL 351962, at *4 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 23, 2014) (quoting Reyher v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 881 F. Supp. 574, 576 (M.D. Fla. 1995)). Thus, “[m]otions to strike generally are disfavored and ‘will usually be denied unless the allegations have no possible relatio…
-
Jackson v. Alto Experience, Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2024)…ns to strike are generally disfavored and denied ‘unless the matter sought to be omitted has no possible relationship to the controversy, may confuse the issues, or otherwise prejudice a party.” Bank of Am., N.A. v. GREC Homes IX, LLC, No. 13-21718, 2014 WL 351962, at *4 (S.D. Fla. 2014) (quoting Pandora Jewelers 1995, Inc. v. Pandora Jewelry, LLC., No. 09-61490, 2010 WL 5393265, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 21, 2010)). “The purpose of a motion to strike is ‘to clean up the pleadings, streamline litigation, and avoi…
-
Truesdale v. Venice Arms, Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2024)…ns to strike are generally disfavored and denied ‘unless the matter sought to be omitted has no possible relationship to the controversy, may confuse the issues, or otherwise prejudice a party.” Bank of Am., N.A. v. GREC Homes IX, LLC, No. 13-21718, 2014 WL 351962, at *4 (S.D. Fla. 2014) (quoting Pandora Jewelers 1995, Inc. v. Pandora Jewelry, LLC, No. 09– 61490, 2010 WL 5393265, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 21, 2010)). “The purpose of a motion to strike is 'to clean up the pleadings, streamline litigation, and avoi…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Reyher v. Tr. Annuity Plan for Pilots of Trans World Airlines, Inc., 796 F. Supp. 579 (M.D. Fla. 1995)
- Dovner v. Circle 4 Ent. Fund LLC, 2014 WL 351962 (S.D. Fla. 2020)