STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
PAUL VICTOR DEBIANCHI, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1989-03-01
No. 87-2935
HERSEY, C.J., and GUNTHER, J., concur., ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.
538 So. 2d 984 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm dismissal of the indictment charging appellee with nine counts of capital sexual battery, finding that it is so vague, indistinct and indefinite as to mislead appellee and embarrass him in the preparation of his defense and to expose him to the possibility of a second prosecution for the same offense.

Our affirmance is without prejudice to the state, unless otherwise prevented from doing so, to obtain a new indictment based upon more certain time periods for commission of the various offenses.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and GUNTHER, J., concur. ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Concurrence
ANSTEAD, Judge,

ANSTEAD, Judge,

concurring specially.

I agree that the trial court’s action was within the discretion outlined in Knight v. State, 506 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) and State v. Garcia, 511 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw