STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
TODD JOHNSON, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court's certified question resolved the jurisdictional authority of the appellate court to review non-appealable interlocutory orders in criminal cases. The State sought to prevent Johnson's defense from calling an Assistant State Attorney as a witness to impeach the credibility of a prosecution witness based on the prosecutor's prior prosecution of that officer for perjury.
The trial court erred in denying the State's motion to strike Selvig from the witness list because Selvig's knowledge came primarily from his role as a prosecutor and was based on conversations with members of the legal, prosecution, defense, and law enforcement communities. However, the error was not substantial enough to fatally infect the judgment and render it void.
[1] Certiorari jurisdiction exists to review non-appealable interlocutory orders in criminal cases that demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of law.
[2] A trial court errs in denying a motion to strike a witness from a defendant's list when the witness's knowledge is derived from their prosecutorial role and community int…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“there was certiorari jurisdiction to review non appealable interlocutory orders in criminal cases, provided they show a departure from the essential requirements of law”
Establishes the Supreme Court's certified answer regarding appellate jurisdiction over interlocutory criminal orders.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRespondent Johnson was charged with first degree murder and armed robbery. He listed Assistant State Attorney Ken Selvig as a defense witness to testi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Certiorari Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We deny the petition for certiorari.
This case has a long procedural past. Petitioner first filed a petition for writ of certiorari in March of 1986. At issue was an order by the trial court, denying petitioner’s motion to strike an assistant state attorney’s name from the defendant’s witness list. The petition resulted in a per curiam opinion by a panel of this court, in State v. Johnson, 490 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), denying the writ on jurisdictional grounds, on the authority of Jones v. State, 477 So. 2d 566 (Fla.1985). We did, however, certify to the Florida Supreme Court the issue of certiorari jurisdiction based on our earlier certification of State v. Thayer, 489 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).
The Florida Supreme Court then addressed the certified questions, finding that there was certiorari jurisdiction to review non appealable interlocutory orders in criminal cases, provided they show a departure from the essential requirements of law. State v. Johnson, 520 So. 2d 570 (Fla.1988). Upon receipt of the Supreme Court’s mandate in this case, we proceeded with the State’s petition for writ of certiorari, after receipt of a response and reply on the merits.
Respondent was charged with first degree murder and armed robbery. He filed a list of witnesses which included Ken Sel-vig, Assistant State Attorney, as a witness for his defense. Petitioner State filed a motion to quash subpoena and strike Selvig from the witness list. At the hearing, respondent Johnson through counsel argued that Selvig’s testimony was relevant on the reputation for truth of a prosecution witness Officer Sheridan. Officer Sheridan had taken respondent’s oral confession, and thus was a key prosecution witness. Ken Selvig had prosecuted Officer Sheridan for perjury in another matter. The trial court entered an order, denying the petitioner/State’s motion to strike Sel-vig from the witness list for respondent/defendant. Petitioner seeks relief from this order. We conclude the trial court erred in denying the State’s Motion to Strike Selvig from the witness list for the reasons recited in Parker v. State, 458 So. 2d 750 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1088, 105 S.Ct. 1855, 85 L.Ed.2d 152 (1985). Selvig’s knowledge came primarily from his role as a prosecutor and is based in part upon conversations with others in the legal prosecution and defense and law enforcement community.
However, although we find error, we also conclude the error in this case is not substantial enough to fatally infect the judgment and render it void. See State v. Smith, 118 So. 2d 792, 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960). See also Combs v. State, 436 So. 2d 93 (Fla.1983).
LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., concurs in conclusion only.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dean v. State, 843 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…5); Garcia v. Konckier, 771 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Young v. State, 598 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Wolack v. State, 464 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), pet. for rev. denied, 476 So. 2d 676 (Fla.1985); Stripling; see also State v. Johnson, 540 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Although the admission of the reputation testimony of the detective was erroneous, we have concluded that it had no effect on the jury verdict, and for that reason, the error is harmless. For an error to be deemed harmless, the…
Authorities Cited
- Combs v. State, 436 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1983)
- Hollis Jones v. State, 477 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1985)
- Parker v. State, 458 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 1984)
- State v. Smith, 118 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960)
- Finney v. Georgia, 470 U.S. 1088 (U.S. 1985)
- Thomas v. Maryland, 470 U.S. 1088 (U.S. 1985)
- Charles v. State, 489 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
- State v. Thayer, 489 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
- State v. Johnson, 490 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
- State v. Johnson, 520 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 1988)