KENT HARRISON ROBBINS, APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEPH SCHEIBER AND ELIZABETH SCHEIBER, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
KENT HARRISON ROBBINS, APPELLANT,
JOSEPH SCHEIBER AND ELIZABETH SCHEIBER, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
540 So. 2d 927
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fote v. Reitano, 46 So. 2d 891 (Fla.1950); Roberts v. Rivera, 458 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Applefield v. Commercial Standard Insurance Company, 176 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. State, 559 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…d on the existing law, he had no choice. A trial court is not free to offer a plea bargain which is below the sentencing guidelines, over the State’s objections, unless it provides clear and convincing reasons for the departure. See State v. Lewis, 540 So. 2d 927 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1989). Although principles of estoppel may be applied in carrying out the terms of a plea bargain, here estoppel has no application. The state offered no plea to the defendant and was not a party to the plea bargain offered by the cour…
Authorities Cited
- Fote v. Reitano, 46 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 1950)
- Doyle E. Workinger v. Klein, 176 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
- Sirmons v. D. C. White Homes, Inc., 176 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
- Roberts v. Rivera, 458 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)