THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
TORRANCE MATHIS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court reviewed a downward departure sentence, with a concurring opinion arguing that while provocation might be a reason for departure, the defendant's actions in resuming hostilities after the victim retreated were not legally sufficient to justify the departure.
The concurring opinion argued that the defendant's actions in resuming hostilities after the victim retreated were not legally sufficient reasons for a downward departure sentence.
The State appealed a downward departure sentence. The defendant was found to have been provoked into an altercation, but the judge noted the defendant…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Use Of Force cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The State challenges the sufficiency of the reasons for downward departure by one cell in a sentence imposed for aggravated battery. The guidelines sentence was seven to nine years; the court over the State’s objection imposed a sentence of five years. We affirm.
The State is correct in contending that two of the reasons for downward departure are insufficient. The youth of the defendant is not a permissible reason for downward departure where, as here, the defendant is twenty-five. See State v. Collins, 482 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); State v. Bentley, 475 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Likewise, completion of a court-ordered rehabilitation program will not support a downward departure. See State v. Taylor, 482 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).
The court did find, however, after an evidentiary hearing, that the offense committed by the defendant was the result of provocation by the victim, although the provocation was not legally sufficient to warrant a finding that defendant had acted in self-defense. In our view, provocation can be a permissible reason for downward departure. Cf. State v. Holcomb, 481 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (duress can be a mitigating factor to warrant downward departure). The State vigorously debates the propriety of the trial court’s finding. The facts were sharply in dispute at the evidentiary hearing, and the trial court resolved the dispute in favor of the defendant on the issue of provocation. As there is substantial competent evidence to support that finding, no reversible error has been shown.
Affirmed.1
JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ., concur. . The offense at issue occurred in September, 1987, after the effective date of chapter 87-110, Laws of Florida, which provided that a sentence must be upheld when at least one circumstance or factor justifies the departure. Id. § 2, codified as § 921.001(5), Fla.Stat. (1987).
COPE, Judge
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur that the first two reasons for downward departure were insufficient, and also concur that there was substantial competent evidence to support the finding that defendant was provoked into engaging in the altercation. I would reverse, however, because the evidence indicates the victim had retreated from defendant’s apartment to the yard outside. Defendant returned to the apartment, obtained three kitchen knives, went to the yard, and stabbed the victim. Defendant conceded that he could have called the police while he was in the apartment but testified that he had panicked because the victim, while in the yard, had called out to a friend to bring him a gun.
Assuming the initial fight was provoked by the defendant, the resumption of hostilities was accomplished by the defendant. Cf. Merchant v. State, 476 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (right to use force ended when defendant returned to house, after which he reentered yard, resumed altercation, and inflicted gunshot wound). While reluctant to second-guess the trial judge who conducted a lengthy evidentiary hearing into all of the circumstances, I do not believe there were legally sufficient reasons for downward departure, even taking the facts in the light most favorable for the defendant.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hines v. State, 817 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…Van Le, 553 So. 2d 258, 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (affirming a downward departure sentence in a murder case based on the victim as the aggressor despite the fact that the jury apparently rejected the defendant’s claim of self-defense); State v. Mathis, 541 So. 2d 744, 745 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (affirming a downward departure sentence in an aggravated battery case because the victim provoked the defendant). While a trial court may not make factual findings at sentencing that conflict with the jury’s verdict, the tri…
-
State v. Herrin, 555 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)…d departure. State v. Thomas, 516 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Further, in a case subsequent to Forbes, the third district recognized that completion of a court-ordered rehabilitation program did not support a downward departure. State v. Mathis, 541 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). This court has considered rehabilitation a factor in support of a downward departure but only in a very restrictive sense. In State v. Twelves, 463 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), this court approved a downward departure where co…
-
State v. TAI VAN LE, 553 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)…dant’s car with the hammer after having fought with defendant and having chased defendant from the scene with the hammer. It was upon defendant’s return to the scene that the shooting occurred. We affirm the downward departure. See State v. Mathis, 541 So. 2d 744, 745 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (“[T]he provocation was not legally sufficient to warrant a finding that defendant had acted in self-defense. [However], provocation can be a permissible reason for downward departure.”). See also State v. Sacks, 526 So. 2d 4…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Collins, 482 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
- State v. Taylor, 482 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)
- State v. Bentley, 475 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
- Balarin v. Allstate Ins. Co., 481 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- Merchant v. State, 476 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)