ANTHONY LAPUMA, APPELLANT,
v.
KING BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-05-02
No. 87-2943
Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
541 So. 2d 1366 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See and compare Earl W. Shomber & Co., Inc. v. Florida Casino Associates, Inc., 469 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); The Florida Companies v. BFA Corporation, 424 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); E.J. Sales & Service, Inc. v. Southeast First National Bank of Miami, 415 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company v. Allied General Contractors, Inc., 365 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Section 47.051 Florida Statutes (1987).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Martinez v. State, 549 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
    …PER CURIAM. The appellant’s revocations of probation and sentences thereon are hereby affirmed. See Russ v. State, 313 So. 2d 758 (Fla.1975); Bernhardt v. State, 288 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1974); Godoy v. State, 541 So. 2d 1366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Butler v. State, 330 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). However, the matter is returned to the trial court for a written order conforming to the oral pronouncements in open court. See Clark v. [*1141] State, 510 So. 2d 1202, 1204 (Fl…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw