THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
LUIS RAMON NOLASCO, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a trial judge's dissatisfaction with the recommended sentencing guidelines is an insufficient reason to depart downward from those guidelines.
The defendant pleaded guilty to attempted burglary and possession of burglary tools, with a presumptive guidelines sentence of 12-17 years. The trial …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Downward Departure From Sentencing Guidelines cases and more on FLexlaw
LEVY, Judge.
The State appeals the trial court's downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. We reverse based on our finding that the reason given for the downward departure was insufficient.
The Defendant pled guilty to the charges of attempted burglary of a structure and possession of burglary tools in exchange for the court’s offer of a ten year sentence. The presumptive guidelines sentence for these offenses ranged from twelve to seventeen years. The Defendant was sentenced to ten years (five years as to each count, to be served consecutively) with the trial court noting that, at the time the Defendant appeared for incarceration, the Court would entertain a motion to mitigate the sentence to three years, concurrent, as to each count. The only reason cited by the trial court for the downward departure was the “[rjelative minor charge for this sentence.”
The trial judge’s dissatisfaction with the recommended guideline range is insufficient to support a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. Scott v. State, 508 So. 2d 335 (Fla.1987); Williams v. State, 492 So. 2d 1308 (Fla.1986); Scurry v. State, 489 So. 2d 25 (Fla.1986); State v. McMullen, 529 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions to the trial court to allow the Defendant to either withdraw his plea and go to trial or to be resentenced within the sentencing guidelines. See Davis v. State, 308 So. 2d 27 (Fla.1975); State v. McMullen, 529 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Castanedo, 523 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Shine Jr., 274 So. 3d 1135 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
Authorities Cited
- Scurry v. State, 489 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 1986)
- Williams v. State, 492 So. 2d 1308 (Fla. 1986)
- Vikki Zimmerman Davis v. State, 308 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 1975)
- Scott v. State, 508 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 1987)
- State v. Castanedo, 523 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
- State v. McMULLEN, 529 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)