MARY L. VIEHMAN, APPELLANT,

v.

GUS F. VIEHMAN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Taylor v. State, 559 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …inson v. State, 551 So. 2d 1240, 1241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). The trial court’s oral findings need not be reduced to writing and were otherwise sufficient. See Parker v. State, 546 So. 2d 727, 729 (Fla.1989), overruling sub silentio Rodriguez v. State, 542 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), and Scott v. State, 423 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Affirmed.…
• Moreno v. State, 550 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …ndant’s contention, however, the trial court upon remand may orally make the requisite findings of fact in open court on the record; such findings need not be reduced to writing. Parker v. State, 546 So. 2d 727 (Fla.1989); contra Rodriguez v. State, 542 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (implicitly overruled by Parker). The final judgments of conviction under review are affirmed; the sentences under review are reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accord with the views expre…

Authorities Cited

• Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)