SHARON TAYLOR, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
As the instant offense was committed after October 1, 1988, the amended version of the.habitual offender statute applied, which deleted the requirement that the trial court determine if habitual offender treatment “is necessary for the protection of the public_” Ch. 88-131, § 6, Laws of Fla.; see § 775.084(3), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1988); Robinson v. State, 551 So. 2d 1240, 1241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). The trial court’s oral findings need not be reduced to writing and were otherwise sufficient. See Parker v. State, 546 So. 2d 727, 729 (Fla.1989), overruling sub silentio Rodriguez v. State, 542 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), and Scott v. State, 423 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Delrick Johnson v. State, 564 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…tatute, which applies to appellant’s sentence because both commission of the offense and sentencing happened after the statute’s effective date, no longer requires the judge to determine that the defendant is a public safety threat. Taylor v. State, 559 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). The new statute specifies that the court may enhance a defendant’s punishment for the current offense if it finds that the defendant was previously convicted of any of the enumerated felonies, or that he was released from custody…1 / 2
-
Power v. State, 568 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…ires that the trial court find that a defendant poses a threat to public safety, the other findings necessary to an habitual offender determination survived the 1988 amendment.3 Johnson v. State, 564 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Taylor v. State, 559 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). These findings need [*512] not be reduced to writing as long as they are made in a reported judicial proceeding. Parker v. State, 546 So. 2d 727 (Fla.1989). Upon remand, the trial court may reconsider application of the habitual…
-
Johnson v. State, 564 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…Habitual Offender Act, section 775.084(3), Florida Statutes (1988), contained in Ch. 88-131, section 6, Laws of Florida, the appellant’s contention that the extended sentence imposed by the court was defective is without merit. See Taylor v. State, 559 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Robinson v. State, 551 So. 2d 1240, 1241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Affirmed.…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Timmie Lewis Parker v. State, 546 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 1989)
- Robinson v. State, 551 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
- Scott v. State, 423 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- Allstate Computer Exch., Inc. v. Dep't OF Legal Affairs, 542 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
- Viehman v. Gus F. Viehman, 542 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)