BEVERLY HAMMER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Beverly Hammer, challenges the judgment and sentence imposed upon her after a jury found her guilty of trafficking in cocaine. After reviewing the record on appeal and considering the briefs and argument presented by counsel, we find the points raised by the appellant are without merit and, accordingly, affirm. As to the appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, such claims are not generally reviewable by direct appeal. See Kelley v. State, 486 So. 2d 578, 585 (Fla.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 871, 107 S.Ct. 244, 93 L.Ed.2d 169 (1986). The appellant should, accordingly, raise this claim by motion in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
Affirmed.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Price v. State, 598 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)…the same time in jail awaiting sentence on each of several offenses because the defendant was arrested on each offense on different dates, the defendant may have earned more jail-time credit against one sentence than another. Compare Davis v. State, 543 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (holding that a defendant is entitled to equal jail-time credit on each concurrent sentence when the defendant is arrested at the same time for separate charges and stays in jail for the same time on each charge) with Walker v. St…
-
Smith v. State, 574 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…appeal and should be relegated to post-conviction proceedings under 3.850. Kelley v. State, 486 So. 2d 578, 585 (Fla. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 871, 107 S.Ct. 244, 93 L.Ed.2d 169 (1986); State v. Barber, 301 So. 2d 7 (Fla.1974); Hammer v. State, 543 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). . We find no merit in Washington’s other claims of trial error. . Washington’s other challenge to the sentence, which claims that an habitual offender sentence remains subject to the guidelines, is totally baseless. § 775.084(4…
-
Jenkins v. State, 749 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)…e county jail prior to sentencing in a violation case, which includes all time spent in the county jail prior to the original sentencing plus all time spent in the county jail prior to any subsequent violation sentencings. See, e.g., Davis v. State, 543 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). The allegations contained in appellant’s motion indicate that he spent 11 days in the county jail from April 1, 1993, through April 12, 1993, awaiting a June 1993 violation of community control (VOCC) sentencing in this case. If…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Kelley v. State, 486 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 1986)