ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ AND CELIA RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANTS,

v.

GRACIELA COTO, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Wearen v. State, 570 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …. 1st DCA 1987); Wallace v. State, 440 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Combs v. State, 351 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). However, one of the grounds for violation being properly established, we affirm the order revoking probation. Casana v. State, 546 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Underwood v. State, 455 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Gadson v. State, 368 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Coxon v. State, 365 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).…
• State v. Medina, 118 So. 3d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
  …. 2d DCA 2009) (concluding that while the evidence was insufficient to support violation of probation on one condition of probation, it nevertheless was sufficient to support revocation based on violation of three other conditions); Casana v. State, 546 So. 2d 794, 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (affirming revocation of probation where, even though there was insufficient evidence to revoke defendant’s probation based on conspiracy to traffic in cocaine, the evidence “was more than sufficient to revoke the defendant’s…

Authorities Cited

• Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
• Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
• In re Est. of Carl Sylvester Yohn, 238 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 1970)
• Watson v. Peskoe, 407 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
• Josephine v. Luca, 396 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)