RONALD LEON WEAREN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The trial court revoked the appellant’s probation on the basis that he was in possession of cocaine, possession of a firearm, and committed a strong-arm robbery. Other than the violation for possession of a firearm, the violation was based only on hearsay testimony, and this was not sufficient. Davis v. State, 510 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Wallace v. State, 440 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Combs v. State, 351 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). However, one of the grounds for violation being properly established, we affirm the order revoking probation. Casana v. State, 546 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Underwood v. State, 455 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Gadson v. State, 368 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Coxon v. State, 365 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilson v. State, 678 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Porras v. State, 651 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Wearen v. State, 570 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Lavazzoli v. State, 408 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 3d. DCA 1981), approved by 434 So. 2d 321 (Fla.1983).…
-
Argote v. State, 573 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…PER CURIAM. We affirm the order of revocation of community control. See Wearen v. State, 570 So. 2d 1081 (Fla.3d DCA 1990). The trial court erred, however, in imposing sentences in excess of the statutory maximum for burglary of an automobile, § 810.02(3), Fla.Stat. (1989), and grand theft, § 812.014(2)(c), Fla.Stat. (1989). The maximum sentence for th…
Authorities Cited
- Coxon v. State, 365 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
- Combs v. State, 351 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)
- Underwood v. State, 455 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- Davis v. State, 510 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
- Sammie Gadson v. State, 368 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
- Rodriguez v. Coto, 546 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
- Wallace v. State, 440 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)