ANTHONY BURNS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Anthony Burns appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to dismiss an armed kidnapping charge and his subsequent conviction. The court affirms, holding that the trial court properly denied the motion because intent and factual disputes are not appropriately resolved at the motion to dismiss stage.
The trial court properly denied the motion to dismiss because intent and factual disputes are not appropriately resolved at the motion to dismiss stage. The State is entitled to the most favorable construction of its allegations, and the court should not determine factual issues or consider the weight of evidence when reviewing such a motion.
[1] A defendant's intent is generally not a factual issue that can be resolved by a motion to dismiss criminal charges.
[2] When ruling on a motion to dismiss, the State is entitled to the most favorable construction of its traverse.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the State is entitled to the most favorable construction of its traverse, and it is improper for the court to determine factual issues and consider the weight of conflicting evidence or the credibility of witnesses”
Establishes the standard for reviewing motions to dismiss—the court must construe facts favorably to the prosecution and cannot weigh evidence.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMs. Boyd pulled into a gas station with her sleeping daughter in the back seat. Burns approached with a gun, took her bracelet and car keys, and the g…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Armed Kidnapping cases and more on FLexlaw
LEVY, Judge.
Anthony Burns, the defendant below, appeals the trial court’s denial of his sworn Motion to Dismiss one count of a two-count Information and his subsequent judgment of conviction and sentence on that count. We affirm.
Ms. Boyd had pulled her car into a gas station. Her daughter was asleep in the hack seat. The defendant ran towards Ms. Boyd with a gun in his hand and took her bracelet off her wrist and snatched her car keys from her hand. The gun went off when the defendant took the car keys from Ms. Boyd, but she was not hit. The defendant then got into Ms. Boyd’s car and drove away, with the baby in the back seat. The defendant was charged with armed robbery and armed kidnapping. The kidnapping was charged under Section 787.01, Florida Statutes (1987).
The defendant filed a sworn Motion to Dismiss as provided by Rule 3.190(c)(4) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The motion was solely directed to the kidnapping count. The defendant’s motion was silent as to any factual allegation concerning the defendant’s knowledge of the child in the back seat of the car. After conducting a hearing in connection with the defendant’s sworn Motion to Dismiss, the trial court denied the motion. The defendant then entered a plea of nolo contendere, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion. Thereafter, the defendant was convicted and sentenced in connection with both counts of the Information.
Clearly, when faced with a Motion to Dismiss charges, “the State is entitled to the most favorable construction of its traverse, and it is improper for the court to determine factual issues and consider the weight of conflicting evidence or the credibility of witnesses”. State v. Carda, 495 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Likewise, the issue of defendant’s intent is generally not properly resolved by a Motion to Dismiss the criminal charges. See State v. Booker, 529 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
Accordingly, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the State’s charge of kidnapping is not before us. Rather, the narrow issue presented to this Court for review relates to the correctness of the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s sworn Motion to Dismiss. For the foregoing reasons, we find that the trial judge in this case was eminently correct in denying the defendant’s Motion.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Gutierrez, 649 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…itions filed in support of or in opposition to the motion create material disputed facts, it is improper for the trial court to determine factual issues and consider the weight of conflicting evidence or the credibility of witnesses. Burns v. State, 546 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Fort, 380 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). We therefore reverse the order below and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith. . It should be noted that the State was not represented by counsel at any of these…
-
State v. Thompson, 548 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…ompson’s commendable confession of error with which we entirely agree, the order dismissing the information below pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4) is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Burns v. State, 546 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); J.E.S. v. State, 453 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Sealey v. State, 379 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Tobler v. State, 371 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 376 So. 2d 76 (Fla.1979); DeGeorge v. State, 358 So. 2d 217 (…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Booker, 529 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
- ALL Clean Bldg. Maint., Inc. v. Strachan, 495 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)