BOBBY GENE STERLING, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1989-08-31
No. 88-2686
WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
547 So. 2d 1301 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1989) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that at least one valid reason existed to support the upward departure sentence, despite other invalid reasons.


Facts & Procedural History

Bobby Gene Sterling, Jr. was convicted of unlawful sale or delivery of cocaine and received an upward departure sentence. He appealed, arguing all fou…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.

ERVIN, Judge.

Bobby Gene Sterling, Jr., appeals from the upward departure sentence imposed upon him for his conviction for unlawful sale or delivery of cocaine. He contends that all four reasons given for the departure were invalid. We disagree and affirm.

We agree with appellant that three of the four reasons given were invalid. Habitual offender status may not be used as a reason to depart. See Winters v. State, 522 So. 2d 816 (Fla.1988); Whitehead v. State, 498 So. 2d 863 (Fla.1986). While lack of rehabilitation may be a valid reason for departure in some circumstances, as applied in the instant case, it is not a valid reason." See Williams v. State, 504 So. 2d 392 (Fla.1987); Scurry v. State, 489 So. 2d 25 (Fla.1986); Harris v. State, 489 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Roache v. State, 547 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). As for the fact that appellant was arrested on a drug charge while he was on probation for another drug charge, this, too, is invalid. Lambert v. State, 545 So. 2d 838 (Fla.1989); Hendrix v. State, 475 So. 2d 1218 (Fla.1985); Mooney v. State, 516 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Medina v. State, 526 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

However, the remaining reason — escalating pattern of criminal activity — is valid under Simmons v. State, 483 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 492 So. 2d 1335 (Fla.1986) (escalating pattern of drug-related activities).

Because at least one of the reasons given justifies the imposition of the departure sentence, and the instant offense occurred after the effective date of Section 921.-001(5), Florida Statutes (1987), the sentence is AFFIRMED.

WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Walker v. State, 555 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
    …83 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 492 So. 2d 1335 (Fla.1986), which was cited in our opinion, the state now offers Sims v. State, 522 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), Baker v. State, 530 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), and Sterling v. State, 547 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Simmons has already been discussed in the opinion. Sims is distinguishable because in that case the defendant's criminal history included violent, as well as nonviolent, crime. Although perhaps closest to the instant case, Baker…

Authorities Cited (12 total)

View all 12 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw