NATHANIEL AUSTIN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-10-10
No. 88-2512
Before NESBITT, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
549 So. 2d 1133 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Maryland v. Garrison, 480 U.S. 79, 107 S.Ct. 1013, 94 L.Ed.2d 72 (1987); United States v. Ofshe, 817 F. 2d 1508 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 963, 108 S.Ct. 451, 98 L.Ed.2d 391 (1987).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cadwell v. Cadwell, 566 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
    …By virtue of the ruling in Cadwell v. Cadwell, 549 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), the present appeal is dismissed as moot. HUBBART, BASKIN and COPE, JJ., concur.…
  • Dienstag v. Dienstag, 581 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
    …the final judgment of dissolution entered below on May 23, 1991, the final judgment is hereby vacated as improperly and unauthorizedly entered during the pendency in this court of a non-final appeal herein. Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(f); Cadwell v. Cadwell, 549 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Sammons v. Sammons, 479 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Carter v. Dorman, 385 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The cause is remanded with directions to vacate the judgment, but without prejudice to further proceedings not inconsiste…
  • …137, 140-41 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (noting that “[o]ur reversal, however, is without prejudice to the trial court’s re-entry of a similar final judgment and subsequent orders as the interlocutory appeal has been dismissed”); see also Cadwell v. Cadwell, 549 So. 2d 1133, 1135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (explaining that a final judgment may be reentered on remand “as the trial court deems appropriate”); Garcia-Lawson v. Lawson, 82 So. 3d 137, 138 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (“We note that, on remand, the trial court is authorized t…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw