GIULIANA GOMEZ DE CORDOVA N/K/A GIULIANA LLANSO
v.
JOSE GOMEZ DE CORDOVA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's final judgment is affirmed, and the parties' motions for appellate attorney's fees are remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
[1] A trial court may re-enter a final judgment on remand following dismissal of an interlocutory appeal without requiring new proceedings on the merits.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGiuliana Gomez De Cordova appealed a judgment entered by the Miami-Dade County Circuit Court. Both parties moved for appellate attorney's fees.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Attorney'S Fees cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Llanso v. Gomez de Cordova, 263 So. 3d 137, 140-41 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (noting that “[o]ur reversal, however, is without prejudice to the trial court’s re-entry of a similar final judgment and subsequent orders as the interlocutory appeal has been dismissed”); see also Cadwell v. Cadwell, 549 So. 2d 1133, 1135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (explaining that a final judgment may be reentered on remand “as the trial court deems appropriate”); Garcia-Lawson v. Lawson, 82 So. 3d 137, 138 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (“We note that, on remand, the trial court is authorized to re-enter the final judgment since the interlocutory appeals that prevented that court from disposing of the case have been resolved with finality.”). Both appellant and appellee move for appellate attorney’s fees. Pursuant to Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997), we remand both motions for appellate attorney’s fees to the trial court for further proceedings thereon.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997)
- Kathy Ann Garcia-Lawson, Ph.D. v. Lawson, 82 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
- Llanso v. Gomez De Cordova, 263 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
- Austin v. State, 549 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)