THE BARED AND COMPANY, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
HUGHES SUPPLY, INC., APPELLEE
THE BARED AND COMPANY, INC., APPELLANT,
HUGHES SUPPLY, INC., APPELLEE
549 So. 2d 1157
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This case is controlled by Tinwood, N. V. v. Figueredo, 523 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), where we held that a trial court lacks authority to transfer only a portion of a pending action to another jurisdiction.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Katzin v. Mansdorf, 624 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…ip agreement solely concerns disputes arising under the terms of said agreement and do not in any way include the instant promissory notes, the order compelling arbitration of the instant action was erroneously entered. McClure v. Painewebber, Inc., 549 So. 2d 1157, 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Painewebber, Inc. v. Hess, 497 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); G & N Constr. Co. v. Kirpatovsky, 181 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966). The order under review compelling arbitration is reversed and the cause is remanded to th…
-
Newport Motel, Inc. v. Five Seas Invs., Inc., 580 So. 2d 894 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…l summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We affirm. We agree with the trial court's finding that the lease and the assignment were unambiguous on their face and that no extrinsic evidence need be considered. See McClure v. Painewebber, Inc., 549 So. 2d 1157, 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Acceleration Nat’l Service Corp. v. Brickell Financial Services Motor Club, Inc., 541 So. 2d 738, 739 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 548 So. 2d 662 (Fla.1989). That being so, the trial court was faced with a question of law…
Authorities Cited
- Tinwood, N.V. v. Figueredo, 523 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)