NEWPORT MOTEL, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
FIVE SEAS INVESTORS, INC., CHRYSLER CAPITAL REALTY, INC., AND NEWPORT OPERATING CORPORATION, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1991-06-18
No. 90-1521
Before FERGUSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
580 So. 2d 894 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals the trial court’s entry of final summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We affirm.

We agree with the trial court's finding that the lease and the assignment were unambiguous on their face and that no extrinsic evidence need be considered. See McClure v. Painewebber, Inc., 549 So. 2d 1157, 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Acceleration Nat’l Service Corp. v. Brickell Financial Services Motor Club, Inc., 541 So. 2d 738, 739 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 548 So. 2d 662 (Fla.1989). That being so, the trial court was faced with a question of law and summary final judgment was properly entered in favor of the defendants.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw