EMMA HODGES, APPELLANT,
v.
RICHARD THERIEN AND WILLIAM R. BROOKS, ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in approving the results of the administrative proceedings which led to the termination of her rental assistance benefits. The regulations governing the administrative hearing on the issue require that some evidence, other than hearsay, be presented to support the charges against a recipient. See Pasco County School Board v. Florida Public Emp. Rel. Comm., 358 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). In this case, only hearsay evidence was presented, and even that evidence was directly refuted by appellant. Accordingly, that evidence was insufficient to support the determination that appellant was not entitled to further benefits.
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
A.J. v. State, 677 So. 2d 935 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…78 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 613 So. 2d 5 (Fla.1992). The court must only determine what the child may reasonably be expected to earn upon finding suitable employment and base the amount of restitution on those earnings. Id.; see R.F. v. State, 549 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Of course, the requirement that the child obtain employment suitable for his age and school status can be a condition of probation. In this ease, there is no record evidence of what appellant, now 16, could reasonably be expecte…
-
In the Interest of J.M., 601 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…t to section 39.-054(1)(a)2, Florida Statutes (Supp.1990). We agree. The inquiry is mandatory. D.G. v. State, 516 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). The court’s failure to conduct such inquiry in this instance constitutes reversible error. R.F. v. State, 549 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). We are not persuaded by the state’s argument that appellant failed to object below to imposition of restitution on these specific grounds. Because appellant child was not represented by counsel and the court failed to make the r…
-
In the Interest of J.S., 557 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…PER CURIAM. Reversed and remanded on the authority of R.F. v. State, 549 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Johnston v. Revitz, 358 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)