HARRY K. JOHNSTON, APPELLANT,
v.
MAURICE REVITZ, TRUSTEE, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1978-05-02
No. 77-725
Before PEARSON and HUBBART, JJ., and CRAWFORD, GRADY L. (Ret.), Associate Judge.
358 So. 2d 108 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1978) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*109] PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Duval Jewelry Co. v. Smith, 102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 878 (1931); Herbeck v. Holdeman, 163 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hodges v. Therien, 549 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
    …nce benefits. The regulations governing the administrative hearing on the issue require that some evidence, other than hearsay, be presented to support the charges against a recipient. See Pasco County School Board v. Florida Public Emp. Rel. Comm., 358 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). In this case, only hearsay evidence was presented, and even that evidence was directly refuted by appellant. Accordingly, that evidence was insufficient to support the determination that appellant was not entitled to further ben…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw