JAMES MIGILORE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1989-10-19
No. 89-396
BOOTH, JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
550 So. 2d 163 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1989)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*164] PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a departure sentence. The only statement of the reasons for departure is found in the guideline scoresheet and states:

He is an habitual offender in that he has no respect for the property of others and has committed heinous crimes while awaiting sentence on this crime. He shows no remorse.

None of the reasons listed on the score-sheet is sufficient for departure from the guidelines. Whitehead v. State, 498 So. 2d 863 (Fla.1987); Hill v. State, 498 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Aleman v. State, 498 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Bradley v. State, 509 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); State v, Mischler, 488 So. 2d 523 (Fla.1986); Hendrix v. State, 475 So. 2d 1218 (Fla.1985); Rease v. State, 485 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Pendleton v. State, 493 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Sarvis v. State, 465 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Shull v. Dugger, 515 So. 2d 748 (Fla.1987).

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s sentence and remand the case for resentencing within the guidelines.

BOOTH, JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw