THE FLORIDA BAR, PETITIONER,
v.
HERMAN T. ISIS, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the referee's recommendation and disbarred attorney Herman T. Isis for his conviction of fraud-related felonies. The Court rejected Isis's arguments that his no-contest plea was an Alford plea and that prosecution was a vendetta, finding his conviction conclusive proof of guilt in disciplinary proceedings.
Disbarred. The Court held that disbarred is required based on the serious nature of the fraud felonies. The conviction is conclusive proof of guilt in disciplinary proceedings. The no-contest plea was not an Alford plea because there was no evidence of a protestation of innocence, and no referee finding supported Isis's current claim of innocence.
[1] A conviction for a felony involving fraud, dishonesty, deceit, and misrepresentation warrants disbarment.
[2] An adjudication of guilt for a felony is conclusive proof of guilt for purposes of bar disciplinary proceedings.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We agree with the bar's argument that disbarred is required based on the serious nature of the felony for which Isis was convicted.”
Establishes the Court's holding that serious fraud felonies warrant disbarred as discipline
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHerman T. Isis, a suspended member of The Florida Bar, pled no contest on July 19, 1987 to conspiracy to commit organized fraud (second-degree felony)…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Protestation Of Innocence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The Florida Bar petitions this Court to adopt the referee’s report recommending that Herman T. Isis be suspended or disbarred. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, §15, Fla. Const. Herman T. Isis is a suspended member of The Florida Bar. On July 19, 1987, he pled no contest to a charge of conspiracy to commit organized fraud, a second-degree felony; and to a charge of unlawful use of boiler rooms, a third-degree felony. He was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to eighteen months’ imprisonment on the fraud charge. The court withheld adjudication as to the other charge, but imposed a condition of five years’ probation, running consecutively to the eighteen-month sentence. Isis served seventy-seven days and was fined $10,000.
In subsequent Bar discipline proceedings, the referee concluded that Isis had been adjudicated guilty of criminal charges involving fraud, dishonesty, deceit and misrepresentation. The referee found Isis guilty of violating bar disciplinary rules, and concluded that several aggravating factors existed. These factors included using a professional license and legal skills to violate the law and a prior disciplinary offense resulting in three months’ suspension. See State ex rel. The Florida Bar v. Isis, 113 So. 2d 227 (Fla.1959).
As for punishment, the referee stated:
I recommend that as a minimum, Mr. Isis be suspended from the practice of law for the maximum period of three years and that he be required to demonstrate proof of rehabilitation as provided in Rule 3-5.1(e), Rules of Discipline; and at a maximum, that he be disbarred for five years.
Isis contests the referee’s recommendations and asks the Court to impose no discipline or, in the alternative, to suspend him for a three-year period. He argues that his no contest plea was merely an Alford1 plea and that his prosecution was the result of a vendetta by a state agency that he had defeated in court proceedings.
We agree with the bar’s argument that disbarment is required based on the serious nature of the felony for which Isis was convicted. E.g., The Florida Bar v. Haimowitz, 512 So. 2d 200 (Fla.1987). Isis was adjudicated guilty of a serious fraud involving large sums of money. This conviction is conclusive proof of guilt for purposes of Bar disciplinary proceedings. The Florida Bar v. Onett, 504 So. 2d 388, 390 (Fla.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 850, 108 S.Ct. 150, 98 L.Ed.2d 105 (1987). Although he contends he entered an Alford plea, we can find no evidence in the record that Isis’ plea was accompanied by a protestation of innocence as required by North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37, 91 S.Ct. 160, 167, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970).
Nor is there any evidence or a finding by the referee supporting Isis’ present claim of innocence. Thus, this case is distinguishable from The Florida Bar v. Pavlick, 504 So. 2d 1231 (Fla.1987), in which we held that a minor felony conviction entered pursuant to an Alford plea will not necessarily result in disbarment if there is evidence and a referee’s finding supporting innocence.
As for discipline, we note that the referee in this instance improperly recommended a range of discipline. The clear duty of the referee is to recommend a definite and precise form of discipline, not a range. The Florida Bar v. Byron, 424 So. 2d 748 (Fla.1982). We admonish referees to comply with this duty in the future.
We adopt the referee’s findings and disbar Isis from the practice of law effective immediately upon the filing of this opinion. Judgment for costs in the amount of $876.00 is entered against Isis, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur. . See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37, 91 S.Ct. 160, 167, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970) ("a plea ... containing a protestation of innocence when ... a defendant intelligently concludes that his interests require entry of a guilty plea”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Florida BAR v. Greene, 926 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 2006)…ent following federal wire fraud conviction); Fla. Bar v. Levine, 571 So. 2d 420 (Fla.1990) (disapproving recommended sanction of three-years’ suspension and instead imposing disbarment following state securities fraud conviction); Fla. Bar v. Isis, 552 So. 2d 912 (Fla.1989) (approving disbarment following state conviction for conspiracy to commit organized fraud); Fla. Bar v. Hosner, 536 So. 2d 188 (Fla.1988) (approving disbarment following federal mail fraud conviction); Fla. Bar v. Haimowitz, 512 So. 2d 20…
-
THE Florida BAR v. Wolis, 783 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 2001)…ion of felony arson, the commission of which allows an attorney to collect over $30,000 in insurance proceeds, is a serious offense which warrants disbarment, notwithstanding the facts considered in mitigation by the referee.”); Florida Bar v. Isis, 552 So. 2d 912, 913 (Fla.1989) (“We agree with the Bar’s argument that disbarment is required based on the serious nature of the felony for which [the subject attorney] was convicted [i.e., conspiracy to commit organized fraud].”). CONCLUSION Here, the underlyin…
-
THE Florida BAR v. Levine, 571 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 1990)…ring in the profits of the scheme and that the only financial benefit he received was the reasonable attorney’s fees for the work he performed. The Florida Bar seeks disbarment. The Bar argues that this case is identical to The Florida Bar v. Isis, 552 So. 2d 912 (Fla.1989), and that it merits the same discipline. The respondent in Isis was involved in the same fraudulent scheme as Levine and was named a codefendant in both counts to which Levine pled guilty. Since Isis was disbarred, the Bar asserts that Le…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (U.S. 1970)
- THE Florida BAR v. Pavlick, 504 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 1987)
- Hagebush v. First Nat'l Bank of Omaha, 484 U.S. 850 (U.S. 1987)
- Combs v. Seaboard Sys. R.R., Inc., 484 U.S. 850 (U.S. 1987)
- THE Florida BAR v. Hoffman, 512 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 1987)
- THE Florida BAR v. Onett, 504 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 1987)
- State of Fla. ex rel. The Fla. BAR v. Isis, 113 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1959)
- THE Florida BAR v. Byron, 424 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 1982)