HAGEBUSH ET AL.

v.

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA; AND HAGEBUSH ET AL. V. NEBRASKA STATE BAR ASSN. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• THE Florida BAR v. Isis, 552 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 1989)
  …(Fla.1987). Isis was adjudicated guilty of a serious fraud involving large sums of money. This conviction is conclusive proof of guilt for purposes of Bar disciplinary proceedings. The Florida Bar v. Onett, 504 So. 2d 388, 390 (Fla.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 850, 108 S.Ct. 150, 98 L.Ed.2d 105 (1987). Although he contends he entered an Alford plea, we can find no evidence in the record that Isis’ plea was accompanied by a protestation of innocence as required by North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37, 91…
• THE Florida BAR v. Cohen, 583 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 1991)
  …at his interests require entry of a guilty plea). . Rule 3-7.2(b), (i)(2) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, formerly article XI, rule 11.-07(1), (4) of the Integration Rule; The Florida Bar v. Onett, 504 So. 2d 388, 390 (Fla.), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 850, 108 S.Ct. 150, 98 L.Ed.2d 105 (1987). . The referee considered in mitigation: the "circumstances surrounding" the plea; the lapse of time since the offense; the fact that Cohen had been a member of the legal profession since 1969 and had no prior…
• Ultramar Am. Ltd. v. Dwelle, 900 F.2d 1412 (9th Cir. 1990)
  …tion, the district court could assert jurisdiction to protect the prior federal judgment and prevent Ultramar from circumventing its preclusive effect, citing Sullivan v. First Affiliated Sec., Inc., 813 F. 2d 1368, 1375-76 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 850, 108 S.Ct. 150, 98 L.Ed.2d 106 (1987), and Salveson, 731 F. 2d at 1427. A. Claims “Arising Under” Federal Law Ordinarily, the existence of federal question jurisdiction is determined from the face of the complaint. Whether the complaint states a c…