ROBINSON IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
G. D. JACKSON AND A. B. HOYT, APPELLEES

Fla. | 1908-01-01
55 Fla. 657 Florida Supreme Court (1908) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

—.This is an appeal from, an interloe-‘ utory order, overruling a demurrer to. an amended bill. The appeal was taken and recorded on the 24th day of September, 1907, and “made returnable to the next succeeding term of said supreme court, to-wit: the second Tuesday in January, 1908,” considerably more than “ninety days from, the date” of the entry of the appeal, in violation of chapter 5638. laws of 1907, as construed and applied in the case of Parker v. Evening News Pub. Co., 54 Fla. 482, 44 South. Rep. 718.

The appeal is dismissed.

' Shackleford, C. J., Cockrell and Whitfield, JJ-, concur;

Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, JJ., concur in the opinion.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Dupree v. Elleman, 139 Fla. 809 (Fla. 1939)
    …al had expired before the attempt to amend was made. [*815] The appeal is dismissed because it was made returnable to a day more than ninety days from the date of the judgment appealed from, in violation of the statute. Robinson Imp. Co. v. Jackson, 55 Fla. 657, 45 So. 987. It is so ordered. Terrell, C. J., and Brown-, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.…
  • Gadsden v. State, 76 Fla. 543 (Fla. 1918)
    …pliance with the express provisions of the statute. .This being true, this court has no jurisdiction of the causé, and it is, therefore, dismissed upon the authority of Ates v. Langley, 61 Fla. 504, 54 South. Rep. 264; Robinson Imp. Co. v. Jackson, 55 Fla. 657, 45 South. Rep. 987; Parker v. Evening News Pub. Co., 54 Fla. 482, 44 South. Rep. 718; Barnett v. Hickson, 48 Fla. 68, 37 South. Rep. 210; Ghira v. Foster, 46 Fla. 196, 35 South. Rep. 876; Savannah, F. & W. Ry. Co. v. Justice, 41 Fla. 508, 26 South.…
  • E. Coast Lumber Co. v. Walter Walton Co., 87 Fla. 326 (Fla. 1924)
    …ate of the writ,” is in violation of the statute (Sec. 2908, Rev. Gen. Stats. 1920) and the writ of error is dismissed. Anderson v. State, 73 Fla. 86, 74 South. Rep. 6; Gadsden v. State, 76 Fla. 543, 80 South. Rep. 308; Robinson Imp. Co. v. Jackson, 55 Fla. 657, 45 South. Rep. 987; Ates v. Langley, 61 Fla. 504, 54 South. Rep. 264, Ayers v. Daniels, 67 Fla. 482, 65 South. Rep. 660. A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Columbia County; M. F. Horne, Judge. Dismissed. Whítpield, P. J., and West and Terr…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw