EAST COAST LUMBER COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
WALTER WALTON COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1924-04-04
Whítpield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
87 Fla. 326 Florida Supreme Court (1924) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The writ of error herein was dated and recorded June 9, 1923, and made returnable to this Court on September 10, 1923, which return day being “more than ninety days from the date of the writ,” is in violation of the statute (Sec. 2908, Rev. Gen. Stats. 1920) and the writ of error is dismissed. Anderson v. State, 73 Fla. 86, 74 South. Rep. 6; Gadsden v. State, 76 Fla. 543, 80 South. Rep. 308; Robinson Imp. Co. v. Jackson, 55 Fla. 657, 45 South. Rep. 987; Ates v. Langley, 61 Fla. 504, 54 South. Rep. 264, Ayers v. Daniels, 67 Fla. 482, 65 South. Rep. 660.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Columbia County; M. F. Horne, Judge.

Dismissed.

Whítpield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Picot v. Picot, 127 Fla. 591 (Fla. 1937)
    …’ Ins. Co., 39 Fla. 677, 23 Sou. Rep. 442; Arnold v. Boyce, 97 Fla. 484; 121 Sou. Rep. 472, 122 Sou. Rep. 117; Ates v. Langley, 61 Fla. 504, 54 Sou. Rep. 264; Gadsden v. State, 76 Fla. 543, 80 Sou. Rep. 308; East Coast Lbr. Co. v. Walter Walten Co., 87 Fla. 326, 100 Sou. Rep. 738; Buck v. All Parties, Etc., 86 Fla. 86, 97 Sou. Rep. 313; Anderson v. State, 73 Fla. 86, 84 Sou. Rep. 6; DeBogery v. Hafleigh, 81 Fla. 631, 88 Sou. Rep. 470. In this case the notice of entry of appeal was filed on December 11, 19…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw