JORDAN WALKER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2020-05-18
No. 19-0483
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2020)


Opinion of the Court
Winokur

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his convictions for traveling after solicitation for sex with a minor, and unlawful use of a two-way communications device. Reviewing only the charging document, as we are constrained to do under Lee v. State, 258 So. 3d 1297 (Fla. 2018), we must reverse the lesser conviction. On remand, the trial court should resentence for the remaining conviction, which we affirm. See Sherman v. State, 272 So. 3d 829, 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (remanding, after Lee reversal, and instructing court to resentence on the lesser conviction). We reject Appellant’s second argument as meritless.

REVERSED in part, and AFFIRMED in part. WOLF, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw