SAMUEL BRUNT
v.
DAWN BRUNT

Fla. 2d DCA | 2019-05-17
No. 18-3832
272 So. 3d 829 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2019) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court properly denied the former husband's supplemental petition for modification of the dissolution judgment and its orders on child support and contempt, but the court lacked jurisdiction over the appeal of the attorney's fees award.


Headnotes

[1] In an appeal from a final judgment in a dissolution of marriage action, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) to revie…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Samuel Brunt appealed a trial court order that denied his supplemental petition for modification of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage and ad…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

ATKINSON, Judge.

We affirm the single order entered by the trial court titled "final judgment denying former husband's supplemental petition for modification of final judgment of dissolution of marriage; final judgment on former husband's supplemental petition as to modification of child support only; and final orders on former wife's multiple motions for contempt/enforcement." See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). However, we grant the appellee's motion to dismiss and dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the portion of the appeal challenging the trial court's finding as to the wife's entitlement to attorney's fees. See

McIlveen v. McIlveen, 644 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

SILBERMAN and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw