GUSTAVO J. GUTIERREZ, APPELLANT,
v.
MARTHA M. GUTIERREZ, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s award of child support as to the amount, which is well within the guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1987); however, we reverse the ruling making the award retroactive to the date of the wife’s application for temporary support: the wife, by abandoning her application and accepting the husband’s voluntary child support payments, waived her right to a retroactive award. See Wright v. Wright, 411 So. 2d 1334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). We do not reach the attorney’s fee question because the trial court has not awarded attorney’s fees but has only reserved jurisdiction to decide the issue. Accordingly, the question of fees is not yet ready for review,
Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Anaya v. Ileana Anaya, 591 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…he needs of the child and the financial circumstances of the parties, we affirm the award of child support. Further, the wife filed for temporary child support and was entitled to the retroactive award of child support. See Gutierrez v. Gutierrez, 554 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Affirmed.…
-
E.A.B. v. State, 964 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)…ication under similar facts, the police may have had a basis to stop the drivers, but the passengers had the right to leave in the absence of a well-founded, articulable suspicion that they were involved in criminal activity. See also T.H. v. State, 554 So. 2d 589, 590 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (reversing delinquency adjudication for resisting without violence because “absent objective proof of actions by a passenger which evidences some substantial involvement in the driver’s actions, a mere passenger cannot be hel…
-
E.B. v. State, 568 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…te, 519 So. 2d 622, 624 (Fla.1988). There is no direct evidence that E.B., a passenger in the car, intended to participate in the crime or that he encouraged or assisted the actual perpetrator in driving the car toward the victim. See T.H. v. State, 554 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The circumstantial evidence of intent — E. B.’s presence in the car — does not exclude the reasonable hypothesis of innocence, namely, that he merely witnessed the crime. W.B. v. State, 554 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Valdez v…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wright v. Wright, 411 So. 2d 1334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)