RAFAEL ANAYA, APPELLANT,
v.
ILEANA ANAYA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Retroactive Child Support cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Rafael Anaya (husband), appeals from a final judgment awarding child support. We affirm.
Husband contends that the trial court erred because it did not strictly apply the statutory guideline method of determining child support. In Todesco v. Todesco, 583 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) the court stated:
Additionally, child support guidelines, while helpful, are not to be automatically applied; the court should consider both the needs of the child and the overall financial circumstances of the parties. Hillman v. Hillman, 567 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Huff v. Huff, 556 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
In this case, because the trial judge considered the needs of the child and the financial circumstances of the parties, we affirm the award of child support.
Further, the wife filed for temporary child support and was entitled to the retroactive award of child support. See Gutierrez v. Gutierrez, 554 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Miami v. Sanders, 672 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…ssarily involves the intentional tort of battery. Mazzilli v. Doud, 485 So. 2d at 481; see Colvin v. Curtis, 860 F.Supp. 1503 (M.D.Fla.1993, vacated on other grounds by Colvin v. McDougall, 62 F. 3d 1316 (11th Cir.1995); City of Homestead v. Suarez, 591 So. 2d 1125 (Fla.3d DCA 1992); Jennings v. City of Winter Park, 250 So. 2d at 900; Hutchinson v. Lott, 110 So. 2d at 442. The requisite elements for intentional tort actions are obviously more stringent than the elements for negligence actions. The Restatement…
-
Andrews v. The Fla. Parole Comm'n & The Fla. Dep't of Corr., 768 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 519 So. 2d 986 (Fla.1988). Lester, 603 So. 2d at 19 (footnote omitted). The complaint states a claim for false imprisonment for which governmental immunity is no bar. See generally City of Homestead v. Suarez, 591 So. 2d 1125, 1126 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); City of Miami v. Swift, 481 So .2d 26, 27-28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); City of West Palm Beach v. Whittemore, 453 So. 2d 507, 508 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). III. “This is not a case of judicial error. The [allegedly] illegal detentio…
-
Seguine v. Seguine, 627 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…l respects, Affirmed. . Because the incident in this case took place in February 1987, the 1985 version of Section 768.28 was in effect at that time and, accordingly, governs the disposition of this case. . See, e.g., City of Homestead v. Suarez, 591 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (false imprisonment, excessive force in effecting arrest); City of Miami v. Swift, 481 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (false arrest), rev. denied, 491 So. 2d 278 (Fla.1986); City of West Palm Beach v. Whittemore, 453 So. 2d 507 (Fla…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hillman v. Hillman, 567 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
- Todesco v. Todesco, 583 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
- Anderson Brooks v. State, 556 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
- Huff v. Norilyn K. Huff, 556 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
- Gutierrez v. Gutierrez, 554 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)