NEELAM UPPAL
v.
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE L L C

Fla. 2d DCA | 2020-04-29
No. 18-3986
287 So. 3d 545 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2020) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
Smith

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed. See Uppal v. Wells Fargo, 287 So. 3d 545, 545 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (citing Pridgen v. First Union Bank, 879 So. 2d 21, 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ("An order that merely schedules a foreclosure sale is not a final appealable order [or] an appealable nonfinal order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130.")). LaROSE, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Neelam Uppal v. Nationstar Mortg. L L C, 287 So. 3d 545 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)
    …PER CURIAM. Dismissed. See Uppal v. Wells Fargo, 287 So. 3d 545, 545 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (citing Pridgen v. First Union Bank, 879 So. 2d 21, 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ("An order that merely schedules a foreclosure sale is not a final appealable order [or] an appealable nonfinal order under Florida Rule of Appellate P…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw