DALE L. MALLORY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1989-12-28
No. 88-3256
WALDEN, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.
554 So. 2d 635 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED.

Appellant was on probation for a second degree robbery when he violated probation by committing another robbery. The guidelines scoresheet allowed a sentence of five to seven years on the original charge and, with a one cell increase for the violation of probation, a maximum sentence of nine years. The trial court imposed a 10 year sentence and must be reversed for exceeding the one cell upward increase permitted for violation of probation. Scott v. State, 549 So. 2d 1385 (Fla.1989); Lambert v. State, 545 So. 2d 838 (Fla.1989); Franklin v. State, 545 So. 2d 851 (Fla.1989). The state concedes this error and the sentence imposed for violation of probation is

REVERSED and REMANDED for RE-SENTENCING.

WALDEN, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw