SANTIAGO RUIZ
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 3d DCA | 2020-08-12
No. 19-1999
291 So. 3d 998 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2020) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
Emas

PER CURIAM.

We affirm but remand for entry of an amended order of revocation that specifies, consistent with the court’s oral pronouncement, those conditions of probation that the trial court found defendant violated. See, e.g., Knight v. State, 291 So. 3d 998 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020); Hernandez v. State, 254 So. 3d 1091 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); T.M. v. State, 233 So. 3d 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017); Wagner v. State, 201 So. 3d 157 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Brown v. State, 127 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013); Daniels v. State, 45 So. 3d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ruiz v. State, 291 So. 3d 998 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
    …PER CURIAM. We affirm but remand for entry of an amended order of revocation that specifies, consistent with the court’s oral pronouncement, those conditions of probation that the trial court found defendant violated. See, e.g., Knight v. State, 291 So. 3d 998 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020); Hernandez v. State, 254 So. 3d 1091 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); T.M. v. State, 233 So. 3d 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017); Wagner v. State, 201 So. 3d 157 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Brown v. State, 127 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013); Daniels v. State, 4…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw