N.C.D., A CHILD
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida First District Court of Appeal reversed a portion of a restitution order against a juvenile defendant (N.C.D.), holding that the trial court erred in awarding lost-wages restitution corresponding to the loss of illicit work.
The court held that awarding lost-wages restitution for the loss of illicit work was error, and therefore reversed the $3,650 restitution award for lost wages.
“It was error to award lost-wages restitution to the victim corresponding to the loss of illicit work.”
States the primary legal principle upon which the reversal is based
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceN.C.D. and co-defendant S.L.L. were ordered to pay joint and several restitution. The trial court awarded $3,650 in restitution for lost wages attribu…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Joint And Several Liability cases and more on FLexlaw
N.C.D., Appellant, and S.L.L. were co-defendants below and were ordered to pay restitution, for which they were jointly and severally liable. It was error to award lost-wages restitution to the victim corresponding to the loss of illicit work. See S.L.L. v. State, 381 So. 3d 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024) (reversing portion of co-defendant’s restitution order). Accordingly, we REVERSE the portion of the trial court’s restitution order awarding $3,650 in restitution for lost wages. RAY and KELSEY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
N.C.D. v. State, 381 So. 3d 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)…nt, and S.L.L. were co-defendants below and were ordered to pay restitution, for which they were jointly and severally liable. It was error to award lost-wages restitution to the victim corresponding to the loss of illicit work. See S.L.L. v. State, 381 So. 3d 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024) (reversing portion of co- defendant’s restitution order). Accordingly, we REVERSE the portion of the trial court’s restitution order awarding $3,650 in restitution for lost wages. RAY and KELSEY, JJ., concur. __________________…
Authorities Cited
- N.C.D. v. State, 381 So. 3d 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)