ALTO BLOCKER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ALTO BLOCKER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
555 So. 2d 982
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We find no abuse of discretion or harmful error in the trial court’s refusal to cause the testimony of one witness to be read back to the jury at the jury’s request. DeCastro v. State, 360 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1978).
We reverse the imposition of costs which were assessed without giving appellant notice or opportunity to be heard. Mays v. State, 519 So. 2d 618 (Fla.1988); Hernandez v. State, 547 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). We remand for a proper hearing with notice.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
ANSTEAD, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Junus Hall v. State, 569 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Blocker v. State, 555 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); see S.B. v. State, 555 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), review denied, 564 So. 2d 488 (Fla.1990); Coleman v. State, 466 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); see also DeCastro v. State, 360 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 36…
Authorities Cited
- Mays v. State, 519 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 1988)
- DeCASTRO v. State, 360 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Hernandez v. State, 547 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
- Clark v. Salisbury, 547 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)