T.M., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Kester, 612 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
  …e of the incident specifically provided that the privilege does not extend to statements disclosing “the identity of a person involved in an accident when such identity is not otherwise known.” § 316.066(4), Fla.Stat. (1987). See Sylvester v. State, 557 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA), cause dismissed, 562 So. 2d 347 (Fla.1990); see also Combs v. State, 436 So. 2d 93 (Fla.1983). Accordingly, the state’s petition is granted. The opinion of the circuit court appellate division is quashed and the cause remanded.…
• State v. Jones (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
  …yers is distinguishable from the disclosure of identity required by sections 316.062 and .066 in any way that matters. There is good reason for that omission; the statutes are not distinguishable in any material respect. See Sylvester v. State, 557 So. 2d 180, 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (relying on Byers to hold 3Mr. Jones's motion also cited article I, section 9 of the Florida Constitution, which contains a privilege against self-incrimination. However, he has never argued, with respect to the matters a…