NORMAN RUDISELL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
NORMAN RUDISELL, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
557 So. 2d 226
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We conclude that there is no inconsistency of verdicts. See McKee v. State, 450 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Streeter v. State, 416 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); McIntosh v. State, 211 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); see also § 806.03(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). There was no error in the denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal. White v. State, 446 So. 2d 1031, 1035 (Fla.1984); Johnson v. State, 478 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), appeal dismissed, 488 So. 2d 830 (1986).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Murrell Streeter v. State, 416 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- White v. State, 446 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 1984)
- Darrel Michael Abbott v. State, 478 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
- McKEE v. State, 450 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
- McINTOSH v. State, 211 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)