NELSON LAZARO MOLINA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
NELSON LAZARO MOLINA, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
557 So. 2d 880
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Clark v. State, 363 So. 2d 331 (Fla.1978); McGriff v. State, 497 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Larkins v. State, 476 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); McNeal v. State, 303 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); § 924.33 Florida Statutes (1987); Greer v. Miller, 483 U.S. 756, 107 S.Ct. 3102, 97 L.Ed.2d 618 (1987).
Other
Upon rehearing granted, the sentences for armed robbery and armed burglary are affirmed as modified herewith so that they will be considered nonguideline sentences. In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Broyles v. Broyles, 573 So. 2d 357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…carceration through payment of the ordered amounts. Civil contempt orders must always contain a provision permitting the contemnor to purge himself of his contempt by compliance with the court order he has disobeyed. See, e.g., Contella v. Contella, 557 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Allman v. Johnson, 488 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Coody v. Muszynski, 402 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Moreover, the agreement of the parties incorporated into the 1982 final judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage is…
-
Novak v. Snieda, 659 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)…contempt order because the court entered it in response to a litigant’s motion for contempt and the order’s purpose was to coerce compliance with a prior order of the court. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274, 1277 (Fla.1985); Contella v. Contella, 557 So. 2d 880, 882-83 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (Cowart, J., concurring). The contempt order provided for issuance of a bench warrant without further hearing if Novak failed to appear for a deposition. That provision makes the order fatally flawed. “A trial court may n…
-
Dowis v. State, 578 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…done. While a particular proceeding may comply with all legal prerequisites for both civil and criminal contempt the two separate concepts should not be mixed as they may result in the confusion found in the instant order. Cf. Contella v. Contella, 557 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); see also Carter, 409 So. 2d at 127, and 11 Fla. Jur.2d, Contempt, § 3 (1979). The order in the instant case is vague and indefinite and fails to meet requirements relating to each type of contempt. The appealed order is reverse…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Clark v. State, 363 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 1978)
- Greer v. Miller, 483 U.S. 756 (U.S. 1987)
- Larkins v. State, 476 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
- Frierson v. State, 303 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
- Deen v. Zaremba Fla. Co., 497 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- McGRIFF v. State, 497 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)