EDMOND J. DUHART, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1990-05-01
No. 89-1540
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.
561 So. 2d 5 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Peek v. State, 395 So. 2d 492 (Fla.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 964, 101 S.Ct. 2036, 68 L.Ed.2d 342 (1981); Treverrow v. State, 194 So. 2d 250 (Fla.1967); State v. Fernandez, 546 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Garcia v. State, 521 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); State v. Griffin, 512 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); State v. Perez, 438 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Strickland v. State, 681 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …double jeopardy to increase the sentence at a later time. North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); Troupe v. Rowe, 283 So. 2d 857 (Fla.1973); Coleman v. State, 645 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Alvarez v. State, 561 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). See also Farber v. State, 409 So. 2d 71, 73 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (bright line rule that sentence is “imposed” when sentencing hearing is concluded). The state argues that dental bills are properly a part of medical expenses and, s…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw