CAN AM INVESTMENT REALTY, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
A.F. "JERRY" EGAN, APPELLEE
CAN AM INVESTMENT REALTY, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
A.F. "JERRY" EGAN, APPELLEE
561 So. 2d 10
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellee concedes that, due to the ambiguity in the operative dates involved, the two counts of the Complaint which allege breach of contract were improperly dismissed. Accordingly, the dismissal of those two counts must be reversed, with those portions of the Complaint being remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
In all other aspects, the actions of the trial court are affirmed.
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rossi v. State, 717 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…o present evidence that the vehicle, in Appellant’s possession was the vehicle identified by the victim as stolen. See Coyle v. State, 493 So. 2d 550, 551 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Foster v. State, 557 So. 2d 634, 636 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); J.E.P. v. State, 561 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 3d DCA [*612] 1990); C.O. v. State, 557 So. 2d 637, 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). In case number 97-2843, the trial court revoked Appellant’s probation based, in part, on his conviction of grand theft. In light of the reversal on the substanti…
-
T.E. v. State, 643 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…he state was far less than conclusive, the comment on T.E.’s silence was not harmless and therefore requires reversal. See DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d at 1138. Accordingly, we reverse T.E.’s adjudication for trespass to a conveyance. See J.E.P. v. State, 561 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); C.B. v. State, 519 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); S.P.L. v. State, 512 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Reversed.…
-
A.P. v. State, 226 So. 3d 1083 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)…part of the trial court’s order withholding adjudication of delinquency, and placing A.P. on probation, for grand theft and burglary of an unoccupied conveyance, and remand for entry of judgment of dismissal as to these charges. See J.E.P. v. State, 561 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (reversing adjudication of delinquency where “[tjhere is insufficient evidence to establish that the van J.E.P. was attempting to jump-start was the same van charged in the information”); C.O. v. State, 557 So. 2d 637, 638 (Fl…