JOSE AYALA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1990-05-15
No. 89-1449
Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.'
561 So. 2d 422 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. P.L.R. v. State, 455 So. 2d 363 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1220, 105 S.Ct. 1206, 84 L.Ed.2d 349 (1985); State v. Cross, 535 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (rehearing en banc), opinion approved, 560 So. 2d 228 (Fla.1990); Palmer v. State, 467 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Wills v. The Honorable Thomas Wilson, 586 So. 2d 468 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
    …c] [*470] Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure applied and the State should be permitted ten additional days after the hearing of the motion to bring the defendant to trial. State v. Veliz, 524 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Terraste [sic], 561 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). [Footnote omitted]. The two cases cited by the State are inapplicable because they address the immediate granting of a motion to discharge without the 15 day period to commence trial granted by the Rules. See State v. Ferrante,…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw