ALEXANDER F. THOMAS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida's Prison Releasee Reoffender statute does not violate the Sixth Amendment as interpreted by Alleyne and Apprendi.
Thomas was convicted under Florida's Prison Releasee Reoffender statute. He challenged the constitutionality of the statute based on Alleyne v. United…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentencing Factors cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Williams v. State, 143 So. 3d 423 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (rejecting the argument that Florida's Prison Releasee Reoffender statute is unconstitutional based on the holdings of Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)); Hughes v. State, 901 So. 2d 837, 848 (Fla. 2005) (concluding Apprendi does not apply retroactively).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (U.S. 2000)
- Hughes v. State, 901 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 2005)
- Williams v. State, 143 So. 3d 423 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)