DENNIS J. MCARTHUR, SR.,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Second Or Successive Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See McArthur v. State, No. 3D19-1465, 2019 WL 6356428 (Fla. 3d DCA Nov. 27, 2019); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(h)(2) (“A second or successive motion is an extraordinary pleading.
Accordingly, a court may dismiss a second or successive motion if the court finds that it fails to allege new or different grounds for relief and the prior determination was on the merits or, if new and different grounds are alleged, the judge finds that the failure of the defendant or the attorney to assert those grounds in a prior motion constituted an abuse of the procedure or there was no good cause for the failure of the defendant or defendant's counsel to have asserted those grounds in a prior motion.”); see also Perez v. State, 34 So. 3d 99, 100 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Bond v. State, 931 So. 2d 1043, 1043–44 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Ragan v. State, 643 So. 2d 1175, 1176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ragan v. State, 643 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
- Bond v. State, 931 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)