BARBARA JANANN FINE
v.
CLIFFORD TRAVIS FINE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2022-06-01
No. 21-2237
308 So. 3d 172 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2022) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Topics
Scrivener'S Error

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Scrivener'S Error cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated cases, Barbara Janann Fine (the former wife) challenges the second amended final judgment entered in her divorce from Clifford Travis Fine. In a prior appeal, this court partially reversed an amended final judgment entered in the case. See generally Fine v. Fine, 308 So. 3d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Now we reverse the second amended final judgment currently being appealed and direct the trial court on remand to re-enter the third amended final judgment which it rendered during the pendency of these appeals.1 In re-entering the third amended judgment, the trial court is directed to clarify the commencement date for the operative provisions of the paragraph entitled “Extracurricular Expenses.”

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

CONNER, C.J., FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

Footnotes
1 During briefing, we relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court “for the limited purpose of entering a third amended final judgment correcting the scrivener’s error” referenced in the former wife’s appeal. Unfortunately, the trial court did not enter the third amended judgment until after the relinquishment period granted by this court had already expired.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Fine v. Fine, 308 So. 3d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)
    …anann Fine (the former wife) challenges the second amended final judgment entered in her divorce from Clifford Travis Fine. In a prior appeal, this court partially reversed an amended final judgment entered in the case. See generally Fine v. Fine, 308 So. 3d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020). Now we reverse the second amended final judgment currently being appealed and direct the trial court on remand to re-enter the third amended final judgment which it rendered during the pendency of these appeals.1 In re-enteri…
  • Fine v. Fine (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)
    …n Fine (the former wife) challenges the second amended final judgment entered in her divorce from Clifford Travis Fine. In a prior appeal, this court partially reversed an amended final judgment entered in the case. See generally Fine v. Fine, 308 So. 3d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020). Now we reverse the second amended final judgment currently being appealed and direct the trial court on remand to re-enter the third amended final judgment which it rendered during the pendency of these appeals.1 In re-…
  • Pappas v. Pappas (Fla. 2d DCA 2024)
    …his untimely motion for rehearing—are unpreserved. See Reid v. Cooper, 955 So. 2d 31, 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (concluding that the appellant's untimely motion for rehearing was a nullity). Accordingly, we decline to consider them. See Fine v. Fine, 308 So. 3d 172, 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (declining to consider the appellant's argument that the trial court erred by omitting certain stipulations from the final judgment "because the former wife did not move for rehearing or otherwise bring the error to the tri…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw