JOSE S. GALVAN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Apple Premium Fin. Serv. Co. v. Gen. Star Indem. Co., 609 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
  …on and therefore must suffer the consequences for any loss occasioned thereby. Cupac, Inc. v. Mid-West Ins. Agency, Inc., 626 F.Supp. 559, 562 (S.D. Ohio 1985); Niccolls v. Jennings, 92 So. 2d 829, 832-33 (Fla.1957); Sumpolec v. Pruco Life Ins. Co., 563 So. 2d 778, 779 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Jaar v. University of Miami, 474 So. 2d 239, 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 484 So. 2d 10 (Fla.1986); National Premium Budget Plan Corp. v. National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, 106 N.J. Super. 238, 254 A. 2d 819, 820 (A…
• Guess v. City OF Miramar, 889 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
  …t.” Rice-Lamar v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 853 So. 2d 1125, 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), review denied, 868 So. 2d 522 (Fla.2004). As such, it appears the trial court properly submitted the issue to the jury. See, e.g., Sumpolec v. Pruco Life Ins. Co., 563 So. 2d 778, 779 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (mixed questions of law and fact should be submitted to jury). We therefore affirm the final judgment entered by the trial court in favor of the City as to the Whistle-blower’s Act claim in all respects. The Florida Civil Ri…

Authorities Cited

• Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Sergeant Gerald Mingo, 339 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
• Green v. Hood, 120 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)
• Ballard v. State, 323 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
• Poirier v. Division OF Health, 351 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
• Connell v. Guardianship OF Hattie C. Connell, 476 So. 2d 1381 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
• Hampton v. State, 386 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)