MARK FRANCIS ROSSIGNOL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARK FRANCIS ROSSIGNOL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
566 So. 2d 374
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1990)
Opinion of the Court
W. SHARP, Judge.
We quash the departure sentence imposed in this case (beyond the one cell bump-up authorized by the guidelines)1 because the reasons given relate solely to factors concerning Rossignol’s violations of probation. See Ree v. State, 565 So. 2d 1329 (Fla.1990); Franklin v. State, 545 So. 2d 851 (Fla.1989); Lambert v. State, 545 So. 2d 838 (Fla.1989); McGuire v. State, 555 So. 2d 1327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Wright v. State, 554 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Thomas v. State, 552 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
Accordingly we remand for resentencing within the authorized one cell bump-up.
QUASH SENTENCE; REMAND.
COWART, J., and DANIEL, C.W., Judge, Retired, concur. . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701d.l4.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Lambert v. State, 545 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 1989)
- REE v. State, 565 So. 2d 1329 (Fla. 1990)
- Franklin v. State, 545 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 1989)
- Wright v. State, 554 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
- Thomas v. State, 552 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
- McGUIRE v. State, 555 So. 2d 1327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)