RAYMOND MCDANIEL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Raymond McDaniel appealed his third-degree murder conviction for the death of his two-and-one-half-month-old son, arguing that the trial court violated the Bruton rule by admitting his codefendant's confession implicating him. The court affirmed, finding any Bruton error was harmless given the overwhelming evidence of culpable negligence in withholding medical care.
Any Bruton error in admitting the codefendant's inculpatory statements was harmless error because the evidence against McDaniel was overwhelming. The court affirmed the conviction for third-degree murder based on culpable negligence in withholding medical treatment.
[1] A codefendant's confession implicating another defendant in a crime may be admitted into evidence if the error in admitting it is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
[2] Bruton error may be considered harmless if the other evidence against the defendant is overwhelming.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Bruton error may be harmless if the other evidence against appellant is overwhelming.”
Establishes the harmless error test the court applies to potential Bruton violations
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMcDaniel's infant son died on October 23, 1985 from chronic illness and malnutrition. Multiple babysitters observed the child was severely ill with di…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Felony Child Abuse cases and more on FLexlaw
CAMPBELL, Judge.
Appellant, Raymond McDaniel, argues on appeal that the admission of his code-fendant’s confession implicating him in the death of his two-and-one-half-month-old son is reversible error under Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968). We disagree and affirm.
In Horton v. State, 285 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973), this court found that Bru-ton error may be harmless if the other evidence against appellant is overwhelming. See Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969). We believe that to be the case here.
Appellant was found guilty of third degree murder, the pertinent elements of which in this case are: An unlawful killing perpetrated without any design to effect death by a person engaged in felony child abuse. Felony child abuse is the willful, knowing or culpably negligent withholding of food, clothing, shelter or medical treatment resulting in great bodily harm, permanent disability or permanent disfigurement. §§ 782.04(4), 827.04(1), Fla.Stat. (1985).
Appellant’s infant son died on October 23, 1985 from chronic illness and malnutrition. He and his eodefendant, the child’s mother, were tried before a jury. Appellant argues that he was not aware of his son’s illness and malnutrition and complains that the trial court violated the Bru-ton rule when it allowed his codefendant to testify that she wanted to take the child to the doctor, but appellant would not allow her to do so. In view of the overwhelming evidence against appellant, we find that any Bruton error was harmless.
During the weeks before the infant’s death, five people other than the parents had seen or taken care of the infant. All noticed that the child looked ill. One daytime babysitter noticed that he had severe diarrhea, severe projectile vomiting and could not keep his bottle down. She brought this to the attention of both parents three times and told them that they should seek medical attention. An evening babysitter testified that the baby would drink only two ounces of formula, then vomit it back up. She also noted that the baby cried constantly and felt hot. She told the parents that the infant and his older sister were both sick and that the parents should come home. The parents indicated that they wanted to stay out later. A third babysitter testified that when she sat with the baby, he was very feverish, had diarrhea and was vomiting. Another woman testified that when she saw the baby on October 22, he looked sick. His color was bad and his lips were dry. The babysitter who took care of the infant on October 23, the day of his death, testified that the baby would not eat and slept all day. He pushed the bottle away. When she told the mother, the mother told her that the baby had not eaten for several days.
The infant victim here was obviously in need of medical attention. All the babysitters noticed and commented to the parents that the baby was quite ill. Appellant, living in the same house with the victim, either knew or reasonably should have known of the infant’s precarious medical situation. “Culpable negligence” is defined as “ ‘reckless indifference or grossly careless disregard for the safety of others.’ ” J.C.M. v. State, 375 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), quoting State v. Greene, 348 So. 2d 3 (Fla.1977). The evidence was overwhelming that appellant was culpably negligent in withholding food or medical treatment from his infant son.
For this reason, we find that any Bruton error in allowing the codefendant’s inculpatory statements into evidence is harmless and, accordingly, affirm.
DANAHY,, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stephens v. State, 787 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 2001)…are contained in the opinions of the district courts where similar tragic incidents resulting in the deaths of innocent children have been consistently treated as manslaughter or other lesser degrees of homicide. See, e.g., Mudd; McDaniel v. State, 566 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (third-degree murder for death of infant son due to chronic illness and malnutrition); Jakubowski v. State, 494 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (third-degree felony murder for death of six-year-old victim due to child abuse). Like…
-
Leet v. State, 595 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…noteworthy that Mr. Leet was not charged as a principal concerning the aggravated child abuse by Ms. Collins. See § 777.011, Fla.Stat. (1987). Instead, the state charged him with simple child abuse and third-degree felony murder. McDaniel v. State, 566 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Section 827.04(1), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988), states: Whoever, willfully or by culpable negligence, deprives a child of, or allows a child to be deprived of, necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment, or who,…
-
Barber v. State, 592 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…itting the infliction of physical injury to the child through “culpable negligence.” See § 827.04, Fla.Stat. (1987). Culpable negligence is defined as “reckless indifference or grossly careless disregard for the safety of others.” McDaniel v. State, 566 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). In order to prove “culpable negligence,” the state must show a gross and flagrant character, evincing reckless disregard of human life or of the safety of persons exposed to its dangerous effects; or that entire want of care whi…
Authorities Cited
- Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (U.S. 1968)
- Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 (U.S. 1969)
- State v. Greene, 348 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 1977)
- In the Interest of J. C. M. v. State, 375 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
- Horton v. State, 285 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)