JIMMY LEE KILLINGS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We agree that the trial court did not err in determining that appellant’s motion to correct his sentence should be denied. Contrary to appellant’s claim, it does not appear that his sentences on all five (5) counts were ordered to be served consecutively. Rather, it appears that Counts II, III, V and VI were ordered to be served consecutively to Count I, but concurrently with each other. See § 921.16, Fla.Stat. (1987). Furthermore, any complaint appellant may have about the Department of Corrections’ interpretation of these sentences must be addressed through administrative proceedings and, if necessary, by mandamus in the circuit court.
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (28 total)
-
Cleveland Grant v. State, 837 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…then he can file a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court in the county in which he is incarcerated. See Jefferson v. State, 830 So. 2d 195, 197 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Colson v. State, 830 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Killings v. State, 567 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). The county jail where appellant was incarcerated after sentencing was required, when delivering Grant to the Department, to certify in writing “[t]he date the sentence was imposed and the date the prisoner was delivered to the d…
-
Bowles v. State, 647 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)…before the trial court). Bowles’ entitlement to relief, if any, is properly sought through administrative proceedings, and, if necessary, by filing a petition for mandamus naming the Department of Corrections as respondent. See Killings v. State, 567 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Brown, 427 So. 2d at 822. AFFIRMED. DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.…
-
Smith v. State, 785 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…trative complaint with the department, and then, if necessary, by filing a petition for writ of mandamus against the Department in the circuit court where he is incarcerated. See Taylor v. State, 677 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Killings v. State, 567 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Green v. State, 698 So. 2d 575, 576 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), cause dismissed, 705 So. 2d 901 (Fla.1997). Our affirmance is without prejudice to his doing so. DELL, STONE, and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 28 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence