JOHN DONAHUE CRAWFORD, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court held that Section 948.01(5) does not limit the total duration of community control sentences to two years when a defendant is convicted of multiple offenses at a single sentencing hearing. Rather, the statute allows up to two years of community control per offense, permitting consecutive community control terms for separate crimes.
No. Section 948.01(5) limits community control to a maximum of two years for any one offense, but does not prohibit consecutive sentences for multiple discrete crimes. When separate crimes have been committed, consecutive two-year terms of community control may be imposed just as consecutive prison sentences may be imposed.
[1] Section 948.01(5), Florida Statutes (Supp. …
[2] The statute does not prohibit consecutive sentences of community control when a defendant is convicted of multiple, discrete offenses.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“For any one offense, community control may be imposed for a maximum of two years.”
Establishes the core holding that the two-year limit applies per offense, not in the aggregate
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCrawford was convicted of possession of cocaine in 1988 and placed on probation. In 1989, he was charged with burglary of a conveyance and petit theft…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Multiple Offenses cases and more on FLexlaw
GRIMES, Justice.
We review Crawford v. State, 558 So. 2d 1100, 1100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), to resolve the following question, which the district court of appeal certified as being of great public importance:
Does Section 948.01(5), Florida Statutes (Supp.1988) limit the duration of community control to a single two-year period when the defendant is sentenced at the same sentencing hearing for multiple offenses charged in a single information?
We have jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution.
Crawford was convicted of possession of cocaine in 1988 and placed on probation. In 1989 he was charged with burglary of a conveyance and petit theft as well as with violating his probation. He pleaded guilty to all charges. The trial court sentenced him to two years of community control for possession of cocaine and two more years of community control for burglary, with the terms to run consecutively. The district court of appeal affirmed the sentences.
Crawford does not contend that his sentences exceeded the range of the sentencing guidelines. However, he argues that section 948.01(5), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988), limits the duration of community control to two years, irrespective of the fact that the two charges of which he was convicted were unrelated. The statute reads, in pertinent part:
(5) The sanctions imposed by order of the court shall be commensurate with the seriousness of the offense. When community control or a program of public service is ordered by the court, the duration of community control supervision or public service may not be longer than the sentence that could have been imposed if the offender had been committed for the offense or a period not to exceed 2 years, whichever is less.
We disagree with Crawford’s interpretation. The statute means exactly what it says: For any one offense, community control may be imposed for a maximum of two years. See Davis v. State, 461 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). In this case there were two discrete, separate crimes. The statute does not speak to multiple charges and it does not prohibit consecutive sentences. Other courts have reached the same conclusion. Sanchez v. State, 538 So. 2d 923 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Mick v. State, 506 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).
Crawford’s reliance on Allen v. State, 526 So. 2d 69 (Fla.1988), is misplaced. In that case we construed the Youthful Offender Statute as placing a six-year maximum on commitments under the act regardless of the number of crimes which had been committed. Section 948.01(5) places no such limitation on the imposition of community control. When separate crimes have been committed, there would be no more reason to preclude consecutive two-year terms of community control than there would be to prohibit consecutive prison sentences.
We answer the certified question in the negative and approve the decision of the district court of appeal.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, .C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH, BARRETT and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ogden v. State, 605 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)…ry maximum of the term of incarceration which could be imposed. See Kolovrat v. State, 574 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Twining v. State, 380 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Swift v. State, 362 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). In Crawford v. State, 567 So. 2d 428, 429 (Fla.1990) the Florida Supreme Court stated that section 948.01(5) [now 948.01(4)] means that “for any one offense, community control may be imposed for a maximum of two years.” Although the court went on to hold that consecutive two-year terms…
-
State v. Williams, 667 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1996)…that could have been imposed if the offender had been committed for the offense or a period not to exceed 2 years, whichever is less. Consequently, for any one offense, community control may be imposed for a maximum of two years. Crawford v. State, 567 So. 2d 428, 429 (Fla.1990); Davis v. State, 461 So. 2d 1003, 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), disapproved of on other grounds, State v. Mestas, 507 So. 2d 587 (Fla.1987). In this case, the trial court sentenced Williams to 2 years’ community control followed by 2 ye…
-
Poulsen v. State, 610 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…s sentence and remand to the trial court with directions to credit appellant’s two-year community control sentence by four months for time already served on community control. See Ogden v. State, 605 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 5th DCA1992); Crawford v. State, 567 So. 2d 428 (Fla.1990); § 948.01(4), Fla.Stat. (1991). AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Allen v. State, 526 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 1988)
- Sanchez v. State, 538 So. 2d 923 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
- Davis v. State, 461 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
- Mick v. State, 506 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
- Bishop v. State, 558 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
- Crawford v. State, 558 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)