RICK ELLIOTT GOBLE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the defendant has the burden to prove inability to pay restitution, and failure to do so supports an award of restitution.
Appellant pleaded nolo contendere to grand theft auto and appealed the restitution order, arguing inability to pay and insufficient evidence.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Grand Theft Of An Automobile cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on appeal from a judgment and sentence entered on a plea of nolo contendere to three counts of grand theft of an automobile. Restitution was denied in two of the convictions and awarded in the amount of $1,071.12 as to the third. On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in awarding restitution because he is unable to pay and because the evidence was insufficient to establish the amount of restitution.
In Hawthorne v. State, 558 So. 2d 156, 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), this court held:
Although Section 775.089(6), Florida Statutes (1988 Supp.), requires the court to consider “the financial resources of the defendant, the financial needs and earning ability of the defendant and his dependents,” subsection (7) clearly provides that the burden of demonstrating such financial resources and needs is on the defendant.
Appellant had the burden of demonstrating his inability to pay. The State was not required to prove appellant’s financial ability to pay restitution in order to have appellant reimburse the victim for his loss. Here, appellant testified as to his poor physical and financial condition; however, he failed to prove his financial inability to pay.
The trial court found appellant had the ability to pay since most living expenses were furnished during incarceration and appellant received federal disability income. Although appellant later claimed that his federal disability checks had stopped, that claim was unsubstantiated, and appellant failed to present any evidence as to whether the benefits were permanently or temporarily discontinued. Based on appellant’s failure to meet his affirmative obligation of proving his inability to pay, the trial court’s order awarding restitution is affirmed.
Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment, sentence, and restitution order are affirmed.
BOOTH, SMITH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sims v. State, 637 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…5th DCA 1994); Padilla v. State, 622 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Driggers v. State, 622 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Cheat-ham v. State, 593 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Butts v. State, 575 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Goble v. State, 568 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Because defendant did not object to the imposition of restitution or present evidence on his inability to pay, any error was waived. Massie v. State, 635 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Bolling; Padilla; Blasco v. State, 601 So.…
-
Medina v. State, 591 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…s v. State, 555 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Oropesa v. State, 555 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), rev. denied, 562 So. 2d 346 (Fla.1990); Spivey v. State, 501 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), approved, 531 So. 2d 965 (Fla.1988); cf. Goble v. State, 568 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) ($1,071.12 in restitution upheld as to a financially marginal defendant). Reversed and remanded.…
-
Motasha Godwin v. State, 586 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…to make restitution to her victim without considering her ability to pay. We find no merit to her second contention. It is the defendant’s responsibility to establish an inability to make restitution. § 775.089(7), Fla.Stat. (1989); Goble v. State, 568 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Spivey v. State, 501 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). At the sentencing hearing, the defendant made no showing of her inability to make restitution. Accordingly, we affirm the defendant's convictions and the requirement that she…
Authorities Cited
- Orrin T. Hunt v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 558 So. 2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)