SONZ
v.
ROSE-MARIE
Affirmed.
ADAMS, C.J., and THOMAS, SEBRING and HOBSON, JJ., concur. TERRELL, CHAPMAN, and BARNS, JJ., dissent.
It is my view and conclusion that the second amended bill of complaint, as dismissed below, contains equity and its allegations are legally sufficient to establish a resulting trust and the appellees-defendants should be required to answer the same.
See Lofton v. Sterrett, 23 Fla. 565, 2 So. 837; Geter v. Simmons, 57 Fla. 423, 49 So. 131; McGill v. Chappelle, 71 Fla. 479, 71 So. 836; Thomas v. Goodbread, 78 Fla. 278, 82 So. 835; Semple v. Semple, 90 Fla. 7, 105 So. 134; Dale v. Jennings,90 Fla. 234, 107 So. 175; Fisher v. Grady, 131 Fla. 1, 178 So. 852; Elvins v. Seestedt, 148 Fla. 408, 4 So. 2d 532, and similar cases.
From all the evidence adduced the Chancellor then could decree whether the deceased, Max Sonz, by each written instrument intended a gift or a resulting trust of the described property.
I would reverse the order of dismissal of the second amended bill of complaint and require the appellees-defendants to answer.
TERRELL and BARNS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (17 total)
-
Murrell Streeter v. State, 416 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…ribe multiple punishments). Our rejection of these contentions does not, however, end our labor, since if the sentences imposed on Counts I and II are illegal because in excess of the maximum allowed, there exists fundamental error, Ex parte Bosso, 41 So. 2d 322 (Fla.1949); Robbins v. State, 413 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Gonzalez v. State, 392 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Williams v. State, 280 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), which is subject to our review ex mero motu, Lewis v. State, 154 Fla. 825, 1…
-
Mussa C. Bateh v. State, 101 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958)…So. 137. . 148 Fla. 188, 3 So. 2d 873, 874. . 160 Fla. 884, 37 So. 2d 157, 158. .See: Carnagio v. State, supra, note 7, wherein the Florida Court held that a trial is not complete until sentence is passed. . F.S. § 919.23(1), F.S.A. . Fla.1949, 41 So. 2d 322; see also McMahon v. Mayo, Fla.1957, 92 So. 2d 806, in which a trial court’s order indefinitely suspending the execution of sentence was held void. . Supra note 10. . Fla.1955, 77 So. 2d 843; see also: Moutos v. State, Fla.1950, 49 So. 2d 841.…
-
State v. Bolyea, 520 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1988)…tion, is in “custody” for purposes of Rule 3.850; and the district court again remanded for an appropriate hearing. 508 So. 2d at 459. We note initially that the state concedes that respondent is entitled to seek habeas relief under Ex parte Bosso, 41 So. 2d 322 (Fla.1949). Because Rule 3.850 is a procedural vehicle for the collateral remedy otherwise available by writ of habeas corpus, we find that respondent plainly has standing to seek the relief requested. As we stated in Roy v. Wainwright, 151 So. 2d 8…
Previewing 3 of 17 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence